Manned Space Flight is of Little Value

February 6, 2006

 

I’m a space flight hound, and I used to be a manned space flight hound.  In some ways I still am, but if you look at the realities of the space environment rationally it becomes clear that the manned space program is of very little value.  The space station is really neat, but it doesn’t return a lot of science.  Robots on the other hand like the Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunity, and Cassini, and Galileo and so many others have been treasure troves of science and imagery.

 

Sure watching those three astronauts grab ahold of the Intelsat 603 was awesome, but for the money it cost to grab that satellite we probably could have launched three backups.  As romantic as the notion of humans in space is it’s just not going to be a big thing for a long time.  At least not until we have some better paths to orbit (such as hyper-planes, balloons, or beanstalks).  Human spaceflight such as that in the movie “2001: A Space Odyssey” will not be with us for a very long time.  I’d be surprised if we had a thousand people off planet in 100 years.

 

I’m all for it when it’s feasible, but for right now we get *SO* much more from unmanned missions that it just doesn’t make sense to put humans in space.  And don’t even get me started on Bush’s plan to go to Mars.  Why the hell would you drop all the way down the Moon’s gravity well to get to Mars?

 

As sad as it would be in many ways I think we should completely abandon manned space flight.  I know that will never happen, but that’s my opinion.

 

Here’s what set me off.